Export limit exceeded: 414143 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (414143 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-108465 | 1 Microsoft | 20 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 21h2 and 17 more | 2026-10-23 | 7 High |
| Use after free in Windows Update Delivery Optimization allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49785 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-23 | 7.8 High |
| Improper resource shutdown or release in Windows UEFI allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69913 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-23 | 8.1 High |
| Use after free in Windows TCP/IP allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69942 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 24h2 and 10 more | 2026-10-23 | 7.8 High |
| Buffer over-read in Windows Overlay Filter allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108437 | 1 Microsoft | 5 365 Apps, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2021, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2024 and 2 more | 2026-10-23 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108440 | 1 Microsoft | 11 365 Apps, Microsoft 365, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2021 and 8 more | 2026-10-23 | 8.8 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108448 | 1 Microsoft | 11 365 Apps, Microsoft 365, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2021 and 8 more | 2026-10-23 | 7.5 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Outlook allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10572 | 1 Ibm | 3 Mq Advanced Container Images, Mq Operator, Supplied Mq Advanced Container Images | 2026-10-23 | 8.8 High |
| IBM MQ could allow an authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code due to a heap buffer overflow when processing MQPUT operations with malformed message options. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10574 | 1 Ibm | 3 Mq Advanced Container Images, Mq Operator, Supplied Mq Advanced Container Images | 2026-10-23 | 8.8 High |
| IBM MQ could allow an authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code due to a heap buffer overflow when processing MQPUT or MQPUT1 operations with malformed message handle properties. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10743 | 1 Ibm | 3 Mq Advanced Container Images, Mq Operator, Supplied Mq Advanced Container Images | 2026-10-23 | 8.8 High |
| IBM MQ could allow an authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service or corrupt memory due to improper validation of buffer sizes in MQOPEN operations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108468 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-23 | 7 High |
| Use after free in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108450 | 1 Microsoft | 5 365 Apps, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2021, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2024 and 2 more | 2026-10-23 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108453 | 1 Microsoft | 11 365 Apps, Microsoft 365, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2021 and 8 more | 2026-10-23 | 6.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office PowerPoint allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103525 | 2 Wordpress-extensions, Wpmanageninja | 2 Fluentcart, Fluentcart | 2026-10-23 | 7.5 High |
| The FluentCart A New Era of eCommerce – Faster, Lighter, and Simpler plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.7.0 via the 'order_id + billing_address_id (also shipping_address_id)' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to read and exfiltrate another customer's stored billing and shipping address PII — including street address, city, state, postcode, phone number, company name, VAT number, and legal registration ID — by enumerating sequential AUTO_INCREMENT order and address ID pairs. The id-equality guard intended to restrict address reuse is bypassed because the attacker controls both halves of the compared pair, and the unauthenticated AJAX entry point imposes only a soft rate limit of 5 requests per 60 seconds rather than any authentication or ownership check. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11828 | 1 Ibm | 3 Mq Advanced Container Images, Mq Operator, Supplied Mq Advanced Container Images | 2026-10-23 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM MQ could allow a remote attacker with queue manager control or man-in-the-middle access on unencrypted channels to cause a denial of service in client applications using asynchronous message consumption due to improper validation of queue name length values. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86020 | 1 Part-db | 1 Part-db | 2026-10-23 | 4.6 Medium |
| Part-DB is an open source inventory management system for electronic components. Prior to version 2.13.2, Part-DB contains a spreadsheet formula injection vulnerability in the part import/export workflow. An authenticated user with permission to import parts can import a CSV file containing formula-prefixed values, such as =1+1, into user-controlled part fields. When the affected part is later exported as an XLSX spreadsheet, Part-DB writes the attacker-controlled value using PhpSpreadsheet's setCellValue() method without neutralising spreadsheet formula characters. As a result, the exported XLSX file contains an executable spreadsheet formula cell rather than a plain text value. If another user exports and opens the spreadsheet, the formula may be evaluated by their spreadsheet software. This issue has been patched in version 2.13.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76307 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-10-23 | 7.2 High |
| In Splunk SOAR versions below 8.7.0, a user that holds a role with the Users and Roles view permission could use the Representational State Transfer (REST) API to infer authentication token values for other users. If the inferred token grants administrative access, that user could gain administrative access to the Splunk SOAR instance. The vulnerability is possible because the REST API accepts caller-controlled query filters on sensitive user record fields. For more information see Using the REST API reference for Splunk SOAR (On-premises) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/rest-api-reference/7.1.0/using-the-splunk-soar-rest-api/using-the-rest-api-reference-for-splunk-soar-on-premises), Query for Data (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/rest-api-reference/7.1.0/using-the-splunk-soar-rest-api/query-for-data), and Manage roles and permissions in Splunk SOAR (On-premises) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/administer-soar-on-premises/6.4.0/manage-your-splunk-soar-on-premises-users-and-accounts/manage-roles-and-permissions-in-splunk-soar-on-premises) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76303 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-10-23 | 5.7 Medium |
| In Splunk SOAR versions below 8.7.0, a user that holds a role with the install_apps capability could store attacker-controlled content that Splunk SOAR displays in app documentation by installing an app. If another user who holds a role with permission to view apps opens the app documentation, Splunk SOAR could run that content in the browser of the user who opened the app documentation. With this access, the first user could access data and make changes that the user who opened the app documentation could make. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk SOAR does not sanitize app documentation content before it displays that content. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the affected user by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The user that holds a role with the install_apps capability should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. For more information see Manage roles and permissions in Splunk SOAR (On-premises) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/administer-soar-on-premises/7.1.0/manage-your-splunk-soar-on-premises-users-and-accounts/manage-roles-and-permissions-in-splunk-soar-on-premises) and Add and configure apps and assets to provide actions in Splunk SOAR (On-premises) (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/administer-soar-on-premises/8.6.0/manage-your-splunk-soar-on-premises-apps-and-assets/add-and-configure-apps-and-assets-to-provide-actions-in-splunk-soar-on-premises) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76287 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk Enterprise | 2026-10-23 | 5.4 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4, a user that holds a role with the preview_data_management_pipeline capability or edit_data_management_pipeline_job capability could read or delete Data Management SPL2 preview jobs and results outside their ownership scope. The vulnerability is possible because the Data Management Representational State Transfer (REST) API verifies the required capability but does not verify that the requested preview job belongs to the requester. The affected Data Management REST API is available only when the Edge Processor feature is turned on. The Edge Processor feature is turned off by default. For more information see Set up a data management control plane (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/process-data-at-the-edge/use-edge-processors-for-splunk-enterprise/10.4/getting-started/set-up-a-data-management-control-plane) and Getting sample data for previewing data transformations (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/process-data-at-the-edge/use-edge-processors-for-splunk-enterprise/10.4/working-with-pipelines/getting-sample-data-for-previewing-data-transformations) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63120 | 1 Aiven-open | 1 Pghoard | 2026-10-23 | 8.4 High |
| pghoard is a PostgreSQL backup daemon and restore tooling that stores backup data in cloud object stores. Prior to version 2.7.2, an incomplete path traversal fix in pghoard allows an attacker with write access to the backup object storage (such as S3, GCS, or Azure) to execute arbitrary file writes and directory creation outside the designated PostgreSQL data directory (pgdata). When a database administrator executes a restore operation (via pghoard_restore get-basebackup), a maliciously crafted delta backup manifest with path traversal sequences (e.g., ../../../../etc/cron.d/backdoor) will write arbitrary payloads to the host system. This issue has been patched in version 2.7.2. | ||||