Export limit exceeded: 16305 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 14714 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 15018 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (15018 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-98336 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-07 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mac80211: don't offload TC setup on AP_VLAN interfaces AP_VLAN interfaces are purely virtual, so don't try to offload TC setup to drivers. We can't really use the AP interface either since we may not know it all the time, and it could technically even change. Just reject the TC offload so things get done in software. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106322 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-10-07 | N/A |
| Open redirect in AppManifest in Google Chrome prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-106384 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-10-07 | 5.3 Medium |
| Missing authorization in SiteIsolation in Google Chrome prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-106555 | 1 Openbsd | 1 Openssh | 2026-10-07 | 2.2 Low |
| In sshd in OpenSSH before 10.6, GSSAPIAuthentication authentication state can incorrectly be persisted across authentication attempts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106586 | 1 Openbsd | 1 Openssh | 2026-10-07 | 2.5 Low |
| In sshd in OpenSSH before 10.6, the restrict keyword (in authorized_keys) was supposed to be applicable to tunnel forwarding but was not, a different vulnerability than CVE-2026-73283. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106439 | 2026-10-06 | 7.8 High | ||
| Hydra is a framework for elegantly configuring complex applications. From 1.3.4 until 1.3.7 and 1.4.0.dev10, Hydra stores legacy instantiate target blocklists and related execution-policy collections in mutable module-level state. An attacker who controls multiple sibling target entries can resolve hydra._internal.target_policy.UNCONTROLLED_EXECUTION_TARGETS.discard through instantiate(), remove a denied target, and then invoke that target because sibling nodes are processed in insertion order against the same modified policy. The mutation persists in process-global state and can enable code execution with the application's privileges, while a narrow execution whitelist supplied by trusted Python code is not bypassed by the reported direct mutation path. This issue is fixed in versions 1.3.7 and 1.4.0.dev10. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103008 | 1 Elastic | 1 Elasticsearch | 2026-10-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to Denial of Service via a specially crafted request that causes the server to construct and process a deeply nested data structure with no bound on recursion depth. Elasticsearch contains an uncontrolled recursion weakness in how it builds and serializes geometry values produced by scripted runtime fields. Unlike geometry supplied as text, which is subject to a nesting-depth limit, geometry constructed from a script's output is not bounded. An authenticated user with read access to a single index can submit a request defining such a field with a script that produces a deeply nested structure. Processing this request recurses past the available stack space, causing the affected node to terminate. The node does not recover automatically on all deployments and may require manual intervention to restore service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102406 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-10-06 | 8.8 High |
| Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana could lead to cross-tenant data interception. In this context, "tenant" refers to a user or team sharing the same Kibana deployment, not a separate Elastic Cloud organization or customer. Kibana's Fleet package installation process allowed a user holding delegated Fleet package-management privileges, without direct Elasticsearch administrative privileges, to claim a data stream identifier already in use by another tenant. Because ownership of that identifier was not verified before Fleet applied the uploaded package's generated index and ingest-pipeline settings to already-existing infrastructure, an attacker could redirect an existing tenant's data stream through infrastructure under their control. This exposed the affected tenant's subsequently ingested data to unauthorized disclosure and modification, and prevented that data from reaching its intended destination. Interception could continue even after the malicious package was removed, requiring separate remediation of the affected infrastructure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102409 | 1 Elastic | 1 Elasticsearch | 2026-10-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with low privileges to terminate an Elasticsearch node, resulting in denial of service, via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). | ||||
| CVE-2026-103009 | 1 Elastic | 1 Elasticsearch | 2026-10-06 | 7.1 High |
| Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Elasticsearch can lead to Information Disclosure via a specially crafted cross-cluster search request that references an unauthorized shard identifier. Elasticsearch contains an authorization bypass weakness in its handling of cross-cluster search requests made through the Remote Cluster Security (RCS) 2.0 model. An authorization check validates a request against one identifying attribute of the target shard, while a separate, independently-supplied identifying attribute in the same request determines which shard is actually accessed. A holder of a cross-cluster API key authorized for one index can craft a request whose two identifying attributes refer to different indices, causing the request to be authorized against an index they can access while actually operating against a different, unauthorized index. This can expose that index's document contents, field mappings, and other metadata, and in limited cases allows modification of retention-lease state on the unauthorized index. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83589 | 2 Oauth2 Proxy Project, Redhat | 2 Oauth2 Proxy, Openshift | 2026-10-06 | 6.1 Medium |
| A flaw was found in oauth-proxy. The application fails to properly validate the destination redirect parameter (`rd`) during post-login redirection. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by enticing a user to follow a specially crafted link, resulting in the user being redirected to an arbitrary external website after authenticating. This open redirect can be leveraged to conduct phishing attacks or credential theft. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103006 | 1 Elastic | 1 Elasticsearch | 2026-10-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to Denial of Service via a specially crafted, deeply nested request submitted to the aggregation feature of the search API. Elasticsearch contains an uncontrolled recursion weakness in its search aggregation processing. An authenticated user with read access to a single index can submit a specially crafted request containing deeply nested aggregation definitions. Processing this request triggers unbounded recursive execution that exhausts the server process's available resources, causing the affected node to terminate. The node does not recover automatically and requires manual intervention to restore service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102157 | 2026-10-06 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| An insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability in a CloudVision CUE file-serving interface may allow an authenticated network user, under specific attack conditions, to access another user's transient data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102155 | 2026-10-06 | 8.5 High | ||
| An XML External Entity (XXE) injection vulnerability in the WiFi-server Spectralight application allows any authenticated user to send malicious requests, leading to arbitrary local file disclosure and partial denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84169 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Upi Qr Code Payment Gateway | 2026-10-06 | 5.3 Medium |
| The UPI QR Code Payment Gateway WordPress plugin through 1.4.3 does not verify that a payment-confirmation request actually belongs to the order and customer it claims to confirm, allowing unauthenticated attackers to mark an arbitrary order as paid without making any payment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101893 | 1 Newell Brands | 1 Dymo Id | 2026-10-06 | 4.4 Medium |
| Newell Brands DYMO ID 1.5.1.71 parses job files using XmlDocument.Load() without disabling DTD processing. The PC Job Files view automatically parses every recognized job file extension on folder browse. A crafted file on any browsed network share can perform SSRF, capture NTLMv2 credentials, read local files, or crash the process. Fixed in 1.6.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102262 | 1 Newell Brands | 1 Dymo Id | 2026-10-06 | 7.3 High |
| Newell Brands DYMO ID 1.5.1.71 resolves its plugin Modules directory relative to the process working directory. An attacker could store a job file alongside malicious modules / DLL that sets the process working directory to the job file's folder when a victim clicks on the file, resulting in code execution at the victim's privilege level. Fixed in 1.6.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103510 | 1 Perforce | 1 Helix Core | 2026-10-06 | N/A |
| P4 Search prior to 2026.4.2 does not fail securely when its service authentication token is blank. In affected configurations, an unauthenticated attacker with network access can obtain the highest application privilege, potentially leading to compromise of P4 Search and the connected P4 Server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102775 | 1 Phoca | 1 Phoca Cart Extension For Joomla | 2026-10-06 | N/A |
| Joomla Extension - phoca.cz - Authorisation bypass through user-controlled key (IDOR) in Order View in Phoca Cart 5.0.0 - 6.1.8 - Phoca Cart's order-file download endpoint does not verify the download tokens it asks for. The d (download token) and o (order token) parameters are checked for non-emptiness only — they are never compared to the stored download_token / order_token values. As a result, any remote user (including a guest with no account at all) can download any customer's digital goods by enumerating sequential id values and supplying arbitrary non-empty tokens. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105698 | 1 Langflow | 2 Langflow, Langflow-base | 2026-10-06 | 5.4 Medium |
| Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. From 1.0.0 until 1.10.1, Langflow did not verify flow ownership in the deprecated POST /api/v1/build/{flow_id}/vertices and POST /api/v1/build/{flow_id}/vertices/{vertex_id} handlers. Through version 1.7.1, an unauthenticated caller who knew another user's flow UUID could reach these handlers; from version 1.7.2 through 1.10.0, callers had to authenticate but needed no elevated privileges. Such a caller could cause retrieve_vertices_order to load and cache the private graph, enumerate its vertex identifiers, and use build_vertex to execute selected vertices and receive their results. build_graph_from_db_no_cache performed a primary-key lookup without an owner filter. This could disclose private flow structure, configured values, and selected outputs and could trigger victim-configured side effects and build-history records, although it did not expose the victim's variable-store credentials or permit modification of the stored flow. This issue is fixed in Langflow 1.10.1 and langflow-base 0.10.1. | ||||