Export limit exceeded: 25219 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 16959 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (16959 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-76274 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk Enterprise | 2026-10-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.3, 10.2.7, and 10.0.10, a user that holds a role with the read_o11y_content capability could redirect an outbound request from Splunk App for Splunk Observability Cloud through the Representational State Transfer (REST) API to an attacker-controlled host and disclose the configured Observability Cloud Application Programming Interface (API) token. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk App for Splunk Observability Cloud does not fully validate the destination of an outbound request. For more information see Authentication tokens (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-observability-cloud/administer/authentication-and-security/authentication-tokens) in the Splunk documentation. Splunk Enterprise versions 9.4.x are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105636 | 1 Makeplane | 1 Plane | 2026-10-07 | 9.9 Critical |
| Plane is an open-source project management tool. Prior to 1.4.0, the webhook delivery task in apps/api/plane/bgtasks/webhook_task.py calls requests.post() without allow_redirects=False and does not validate redirect targets. validate_url() blocks private, loopback, link-local, and reserved addresses in the original webhook URL, but the final URL reached after one or more redirects is not checked. A user who can create a workspace can register a webhook pointing to an attacker-controlled public endpoint that returns a 302 redirect to an internal address. The Plane worker then fetches internal resources, including cloud metadata, and stores the response body in webhook_logs, where the attacker can retrieve it through the workspace webhook-logs API. This issue is fixed in 1.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89430 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-10-07 | 8.1 High |
| Gitea validated a push mirror's remote address against the `[migrations]` allow and block lists only when the mirror was created. Each synchronization passed the stored address directly to `git push`, so a name that later resolved to a blocked or internal address was still reached. A user with administrator access to a repository, which includes repositories they create themselves, could aim push mirror synchronization at internal Git services and force-push the repository's contents to them. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86345 | 1 Redhat | 2 Directory Server, Enterprise Linux | 2026-10-07 | 9 Critical |
| A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. The server does not discard plaintext bytes already buffered from a client connection when negotiating StartTLS, allowing an on-path attacker to inject a crafted LDAP message that is processed after the TLS upgrade and whose response is delivered to the client in place of the client's own pending operation's response, due to messageID collision. This can cause a client application to treat a failed authentication (bind) attempt as successful. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70357 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-10-07 | 7.5 High |
| Gitea validates a repository migration hostname against its network allow and block lists before invoking Git, but the Git subprocess independently resolves the hostname when connecting. An attacker who can start a migration and control the destination's DNS can change the address between validation and connection to reach a blocked internal address. The affected path is the Git clone operation; validation in the migration HTTP client's dialer does not protect the independently connecting Git subprocess. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107273 | 1 Getgophish | 1 Gophish | 2026-10-07 | 4.3 Medium |
| Gophish 0.11.0 through 0.12.1 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated low-privileged users to reach loopback and private hosts via POST /api/import/site. Attackers can submit internal URLs, which the default dialer deny list does not block, to read service responses and enumerate internal hosts and ports through error messages. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105329 | 1 Tallcms | 1 Tallcms | 2026-10-07 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was determined in TallCMS up to 4.8.0. This affects an unknown function of the file packages/tallcms/cms/src/Filament/Pages/ThemeManager.php of the component PluginManager. Executing a manipulation can lead to code injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This patch is called fdc18f4c6a36134f8986ca1d7e4e97092e3deb93. It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105290 | 1 Feelec-yishu | 1 Feelcrm-os | 2026-10-07 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was determined in feelec-yishu feelcrm-os 1.0.0. This affects an unknown part of the file App/Feelcrm/Index/Controller/GoogleController.class.php of the component getCurlData Endpoint. Executing a manipulation of the argument url can lead to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105226 | 1 Oscommerce | 1 Oscommerce2 | 2026-10-07 | 4.7 Medium |
| A security flaw has been discovered in osCommerce osCommerce2 up to 2.3.4.1. This vulnerability affects the function include of the file admin/newsletters.php of the component Newsletter Management. Performing a manipulation of the argument module results in code injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104973 | 1 Makeplane | 1 Plane | 2026-10-07 | 7.6 High |
| Plane is an open-source project management tool. Prior to 1.4.0, the fix for CVE-2026-30242 validates webhook IP addresses only when the webhook is created in apps/api/plane/app/serializers/webhook.py. The delivery task in apps/api/plane/bgtasks/webhook_task.py performs a separate DNS resolution when sending the request and does not validate the resolved IP address, allowing DNS rebinding to bypass the SSRF protection. This issue is fixed in 1.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104636 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-10-07 | 7.5 High |
| Gitea validated the initial remote URL for push mirrors, wiki remote checks, and fetches of migrated pull request heads, but the subsequent raw Git operations followed HTTP redirects without revalidating the destination. A repository administrator using a policy-allowed endpoint that redirects could make Gitea's Git client send requests to an address that the outbound host policy would otherwise block. The impact depends on the configured policy and the internal services reachable from the server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104074 | 1 Coturn | 1 Coturn | 2026-10-07 | 5.3 Medium |
| Coturn 4.10.0 contains an uninitialized memory disclosure vulnerability that allows remote unauthenticated attackers to leak stack memory contents by sending a TURN Allocate request without credentials. Attackers can exploit the stun_init_error_response_common_str() function in src/client/ns_turn_msg.c, which fails to zero-initialize the avalue buffer before computing its length with strlen() and copying leaked stack bytes into the ERROR-CODE reason phrase, exposing pointer fragments that weaken ASLR and enable precise version fingerprinting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101029 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-10-07 | 4.3 Medium |
| Gitea's repository migration and pull mirror egress checks could be bypassed with a hostname that returns multiple DNS answers, because the address that was validated was not necessarily the address Git later connected to. A low-privileged user who can create migrations or mirrors could direct the server to internal services, reading from and writing to reachable internal Git or HTTP endpoints. Content from internal responses could additionally be disclosed through migration and mirror error messages. | ||||
| CVE-2021-39152 | 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 3 more | 21 Debian Linux, Fedora, Snapmanager and 18 more | 2026-10-07 | 8.5 High |
| XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publicly available only by manipulating the processed input stream with a Java runtime version 14 to 8. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the [Security Framework](https://x-stream.github.io/security.html#framework), you will have to use at least version 1.4.18. | ||||
| CVE-2021-39150 | 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 3 more | 21 Debian Linux, Fedora, Snapmanager and 18 more | 2026-10-07 | 8.5 High |
| XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In affected versions this vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publicly available only by manipulating the processed input stream with a Java runtime version 14 to 8. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the [Security Framework](https://x-stream.github.io/security.html#framework), you will have to use at least version 1.4.18. | ||||
| CVE-2021-29505 | 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 3 more | 24 Debian Linux, Fedora, Snapmanager and 21 more | 2026-10-07 | 7.5 High |
| XStream is software for serializing Java objects to XML and back again. A vulnerability in XStream versions prior to 1.4.17 may allow a remote attacker has sufficient rights to execute commands of the host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types is affected. The vulnerability is patched in version 1.4.17. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79810 | 1 Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe) | 1 Clearpass Policy Manager (cppm) | 2026-10-07 | 7.2 High |
| Remote code execution vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of HPE Networking ClearPass Policy Manager that could allow an authenticated remote attacker with high privileges to execute arbitrary code. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106215 | 2 Google, Microsoft | 2 Chrome, Windows | 2026-10-07 | 4.7 Medium |
| Uninitialized resource in ANGLE in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker to read memory outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-102267 | 2 Jpadilla, Pyjwt Project | 2 Pyjwt, Pyjwt | 2026-10-07 | 7.4 High |
| PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. Prior to 2.14.0, PyJWT PyJWKClient is affected because redirect destinations are not revalidated against the JWKS trust boundary. This occurs when a configured trusted JWKS endpoint returns an attacker-influenced redirect. As a result, PyJWKClient follows the redirect and consumes the redirected response as key material. Consequently, forwarded credentials may be disclosed or verification keys may be substituted. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20362 | 1 Cisco | 1 Cisco Finesse | 2026-10-07 | 7.2 High |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Finesse could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks through an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper input validation for specific HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain limited sensitive information for services that are associated with the affected device. | ||||