Export limit exceeded: 24465 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (24465 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-107121 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On | 2026-10-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the SMTP email configuration handling of the keycloak-services component. When the STARTTLS option is enabled, Keycloak fails to strictly enforce an encrypted connection, allowing it to fall back to unencrypted communication if the encryption request is tampered with. An attacker who can intercept network traffic can exploit this to capture sensitive email credentials and message content in plain text. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106471 | 1 Redhat | 1 Satellite | 2026-10-07 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found in Candlepin. The central authorization filter incorrectly grants access when any one of multiple @Verify-annotated parameters is accessible, instead of requiring access to every verified entity. A low-privilege authenticated attacker who can access the first referenced object can bypass authorization checks on subsequent objects. When target resource identifiers are known, this can enable unauthorized disclosure of consumer information and unauthorized modification of entitlements and related subscription resources, including across organizations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101258 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-10-07 | 7.8 High |
| A flaw was found in Ghostscript. When Ghostscript renders a crafted PostScript or EPS document, it can bypass the -dSAFER sandbox and execute arbitrary shell commands in the context of the Ghostscript process. The issue chains memory corruption in document parsing with disabling of internal path access controls at runtime. An attacker can deliver the document directly or through formats that delegate rendering to Ghostscript (for example EPS import or print conversion workflows). Successful exploitation can compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data accessible to the process running Ghostscript. | ||||
| CVE-2023-41074 | 4 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 1 more | 10 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 7 more | 2026-10-07 | 8.8 High |
| The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in tvOS 17, Safari 17, watchOS 10, iOS 17 and iPadOS 17, macOS Sonoma 14. Processing web content may lead to arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2021-34485 | 2 Microsoft, Redhat | 7 .net, .net Core, Powershell Core and 4 more | 2026-10-07 | 5 Medium |
| .NET Core and Visual Studio Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-31957 | 3 Fedoraproject, Microsoft, Redhat | 6 Fedora, .net, .net Core and 3 more | 2026-10-07 | 5.9 Medium |
| ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-31204 | 3 Fedoraproject, Microsoft, Redhat | 6 Fedora, .net, .net Core and 3 more | 2026-10-07 | 7.3 High |
| .NET and Visual Studio Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2026-18074 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 8.2 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to improper authentication and missing authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18095 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 8.5 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18114 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to read arbitrary files due to improper path canonicalization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18123 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 7.6 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to the improper use of reflection with externally controlled input. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18124 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to insufficiently protected credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107151 | 2 Red Hat, Redhat | 2 Red Hat Satellite 6, Satellite | 2026-10-07 | 5.9 Medium |
| Missing authentication has been found in remote-execution task updates in the smart_proxy_dynflow package. The progress and completion callbacks accept a report when the one-time token is missing. A network attacker or user must already know the identifier of a running job. This applies when remote execution is set to pull or pull-mqtt mode. They can send their own job output and mark the job as a success or a failure. The job is then recorded with that result. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104045 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 4.7 Medium |
| A flaw was found in SSSD. A local user can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by exploiting a race condition in the autofs responder between asynchronous enumeration completion and map invalidation. By repeatedly sending concurrent map enumeration and invalidation requests, an attacker can cause memory to leak, leading to excessive memory consumption that can disrupt or crash the autofs service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18131 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 8.2 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in an authenticated user's browser due to improper neutralization of HTML input. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18132 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized payment mutation actions due to missing authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18133 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to modify server files due to path traversal. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42784 | 3 Red Hat, Redhat, Sequoia-pgp | 12 Enterprise Linux, Ansible Automation Platform, Confidential Compute Attestation and 9 more | 2026-10-07 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in sequoia-openpgp. The library incorrectly infers key flags for older certificates when a key flags subpacket is missing, leading to a discrepancy in how key capabilities are viewed. This key flag confusion allows an attacker to bypass the back-signature check. Consequently, an attacker can illegitimately bind an arbitrary subkey to their own certificate and forge signatures, completely compromising cryptographic integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18134 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81658 | 3 Red Hat, Redhat, Theforeman | 3 Red Hat Satellite 6, Satellite, Foreman | 2026-10-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Foreman. The template revision endpoint does not enforce object-level authorization when retrieving an audited template revision. An authenticated, low privileged user with a template-related permission, such as view_ptables, can obtain historical template contents belonging to another organization or location by supplying the corresponding audit ID. This can result in unauthorized disclosure of historical template contents, which may contain sensitive configuration information, credentials, or other secrets. The REST API revision endpoints correctly restrict this lookup. | ||||