Export limit exceeded: 91392 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (91392 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-23957 | 1 Autel | 3 Maxicharger Ac Elite Business C50, Maxicharger Ac Elite Business C50 Eu Firmware, Maxicharger Ac Elite Business C50 Firmware | 2024-10-03 | 8.8 High |
| Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 DLB_HostHeartBeat Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 charging stations. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the DLB_HostHeartBeat handler of the DLB protocol implementation. When parsing an AES key, the process does not properly validate the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the device. Was ZDI-CAN-23241 | ||||
| CVE-2024-23967 | 1 Autel | 3 Maxicharger Ac Elite Business C50, Maxicharger Ac Elite Business C50 Eu Firmware, Maxicharger Ac Elite Business C50 Firmware | 2024-10-03 | 8 High |
| Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 WebSocket Base64 Decoding Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 chargers. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The specific flaw exists within the handling of base64-encoded data within WebSocket messages. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the device. Was ZDI-CAN-23230 | ||||
| CVE-2024-23938 | 1 Silabs | 1 Gecko Os | 2024-10-03 | 8.8 High |
| Silicon Labs Gecko OS Debug Interface Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Silicon Labs Gecko OS. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the debug interface. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the device. Was ZDI-CAN-23184 | ||||
| CVE-2024-7575 | 1 Telerik | 1 Ui For Wpf | 2024-10-03 | 7.8 High |
| In Progress Telerik UI for WPF versions prior to 2024 Q3 (2024.3.924), a command injection attack is possible through improper neutralization of hyperlink elements. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20433 | 1 Cisco | 2 Ios, Ios Xe | 2024-10-03 | 8.6 High |
| A vulnerability in the Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) feature of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to a buffer overflow when processing crafted RSVP packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending RSVP traffic to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20398 | 1 Cisco | 2 Ios Xr, Ios Xr Software | 2024-10-03 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to obtain read/write file system access on the underlying operating system of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user arguments that are passed to specific CLI commands. An attacker with a low-privileged account could exploit this vulnerability by using crafted commands at the prompt. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to elevate privileges to root. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20483 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xr | 2024-10-03 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Routed PON Controller Software, which runs as a docker container on hardware that is supported by Cisco IOS XR Software, could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with Administrator-level privileges on the PON Manager or direct access to the PON Manager MongoDB instance to perform command injection attacks on the PON Controller container and execute arbitrary commands as root. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of arguments that are passed to specific configuration commands. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by including crafted input as the argument of an affected configuration command. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root on the PON controller. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8405 | 1 Papercut | 2 Papercut Mf, Papercut Ng | 2024-10-03 | 6.1 Medium |
| An arbitrary file creation vulnerability exists in PaperCut NG/MF that only affects Windows servers with Web Print enabled. This specific flaw exists within the web-print.exe process, which can incorrectly create files that don’t exist when a maliciously formed payload is provided. This can be used to flood disk space and result in a Denial of Service (DoS) attack. Note: This CVE has been split from CVE-2024-4712. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7878 | 2 Technowich, Wpulike | 2 Wp Ulike, Wp Ulike | 2024-10-02 | 4.8 Medium |
| The WP ULike WordPress plugin before 4.7.4 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup). | ||||
| CVE-2024-6510 | 1 Avg | 1 Internet Security | 2024-10-02 | 7.8 High |
| Local Privilege Escalation in AVG Internet Security v24 on Windows allows a local unprivileged user to escalate privileges to SYSTEM via COM-Hijacking. | ||||
| CVE-2023-51157 | 1 Zkteco | 2 Wdms, Wdms Pro | 2024-10-02 | 5.4 Medium |
| Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in ZKTeco WDMS v.5.1.3 Pro allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code and obtain sensitive information via a crafted script to the Emp Name parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2024-46488 | 2 Asg017, Sqlite | 2 Sqlite-vec, Sqlite-vec | 2024-10-02 | 9.1 Critical |
| sqlite-vec v0.1.1 was discovered to contain a heap buffer overflow via the npy_token_next function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted file. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5480 | 2024-10-02 | 10.0 Critical | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2024-46655 | 1 Ellevo | 1 Ellevo | 2024-10-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Ellevo 6.2.0.38160 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code in the context of a user's browser via a crafted payload or URL. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9199 | 2 Clibo Manager, Clibomanager | 2 Clibo Manager, Clibo Manager | 2024-10-02 | 5.8 Medium |
| Rate limit vulnerability in Clibo Manager v1.1.9.2 that could allow an attacker to send a large number of emails to the victim in a short time, affecting availability and leading to a denial of service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2024-9198 | 1 Clibomanager | 1 Clibo Manager | 2024-10-02 | 7.6 High |
| Vulnerability in Clibo Manager v1.1.9.1 that could allow an attacker to execute an stored Cross-Site Scripting (stored XSS ) by uploading a malicious .svg image in the section: Profile > Profile picture. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3635 | 2 Post Grid Team By Radiustheme, Radiustheme | 2 The Post Grid, The Post Grid | 2024-10-02 | 4.8 Medium |
| The Post Grid WordPress plugin before 7.5.0 does not sanitise and escape some of its Grid settings, which could allow high privilege users such as Editor and above to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup). | ||||
| CVE-2024-38380 | 1 Millbeckcommunications | 2 Proroute H685t-w, Proroute H685t-w Firmware | 2024-10-02 | 5.5 Medium |
| This vulnerability occurs when user-supplied input is improperly sanitized and then reflected back to the user's browser, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the victim's browser session. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45613 | 1 Ckeditor | 1 Ckeditor5 | 2024-10-01 | 6.1 Medium |
| CKEditor 5 is a JavaScript rich-text editor. Starting in version 40.0.0 and prior to version 43.1.1, a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability is present in the CKEditor 5 clipboard package. This vulnerability could be triggered by a specific user action, leading to unauthorized JavaScript code execution, if the attacker managed to insert a malicious content into the editor, which might happen with a very specific editor configuration. This vulnerability only affects installations where the Block Toolbar plugin is enabled and either the General HTML Support (with a configuration that permits unsafe markup) or the HTML Embed plugin is also enabled. A fix for the problem is available in version 43.1.1. As a workaround, one may disable the block toolbar plugin. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45302 | 1 Restsharp | 1 Restsharp | 2024-10-01 | 6.1 Medium |
| RestSharp is a Simple REST and HTTP API Client for .NET. The second argument to `RestRequest.AddHeader` (the header value) is vulnerable to CRLF injection. The same applies to `RestRequest.AddOrUpdateHeader` and `RestClient.AddDefaultHeader`. The way HTTP headers are added to a request is via the `HttpHeaders.TryAddWithoutValidation` method which does not check for CRLF characters in the header value. This means that any headers from a `RestSharp.RequestHeaders` object are added to the request in such a way that they are vulnerable to CRLF-injection. In general, CRLF-injection into a HTTP header (when using HTTP/1.1) means that one can inject additional HTTP headers or smuggle whole HTTP requests. If an application using the RestSharp library passes a user-controllable value through to a header, then that application becomes vulnerable to CRLF-injection. This is not necessarily a security issue for a command line application like the one above, but if such code were present in a web application then it becomes vulnerable to request splitting (as shown in the PoC) and thus Server Side Request Forgery. Strictly speaking this is a potential vulnerability in applications using RestSharp, not in RestSharp itself, but I would argue that at the very least there needs to be a warning about this behaviour in the RestSharp documentation. RestSharp has addressed this issue in version 112.0.0. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||