Export limit exceeded: 17034 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (17034 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-95930 | 1 Iflytek | 1 Astron-agent | 2026-09-23 | 6.3 Medium |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in iFlytek astron-agent up to 1.0.6. Affected by this vulnerability is the function UrlCheckTool.checkUrl of the component debugToolV2 API endpoint. The manipulation of the argument endPoint leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version reward-1575 addresses this issue. The identifier of the patch is 45ee5fb647e9894e73b0d7720fa94a66e4540bbb. The affected component should be upgraded. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16426 | 1 Ibm | 1 Concert | 2026-09-23 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82000 | 1 Adobe | 2 Aem 6.5 Forms Jee, Aem 6.5 Lts Forms Jee | 2026-09-23 | 9.6 Critical |
| Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81999 | 1 Adobe | 2 Aem 6.5 Forms Jee, Aem 6.5 Lts Forms Jee | 2026-09-23 | 8.7 High |
| Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84644 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation- controller. The Thycotic Secret Server external credential plugin passes a user-supplied server URL to its SDK without validating the scheme, host, or IP range, and the plugin backend is executed synchronously within the automation controller web process. Using the external credential test endpoint, a user who holds only the use role on such a credential can override the stored server URL with an arbitrary internal address, causing the control plane to issue requests to internal services. Although the response is a generic error, response timing reveals whether internal hosts and ports are reachable, enabling internal network reconnaissance and a blind request-forgery primitive from the control plane, and each request can hold a web worker, affecting availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84689 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 8.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation- controller. The bulk job launch endpoint builds workflow job nodes from client input using a serializer that leaves the node's job reference -- a field normally set by the workflow task manager after it spawns a child job -- writable and does not include it in the permission validation performed for the other node fields. An authenticated user with permission to execute a single job template can submit a bulk job launch whose node references the identifier of any unified job in any organization, including jobs they cannot access. The node then exposes that job's metadata, and cancelling the attacker's workflow cancels the referenced job through the workflow cancellation cascade, without any per-job authorization check. Repeated, this allows a low-privileged user to cancel running jobs, project and inventory syncs, ad hoc commands, and system jobs across all organizations, denying automation service platform-wide. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84395 | 1 Adobe | 1 Premiere | 2026-09-22 | 7.1 High |
| Premiere Pro is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation potentially resulting in unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18730 | 1 Github | 1 Enterprise Server | 2026-09-22 | 7.4 High |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an unauthenticated attacker to cause the Manage API to send crafted outbound requests to an attacker-controlled host. An unauthenticated endpoint parsed an attacker-supplied cluster configuration and issued gateway-to-agent requests whose HMAC authenticated only a timestamp, not the request path or body. An attacker positioned to intercept the outbound request could capture this token and replay it against privileged management agent endpoints. High-availability deployments were not affected due to a topology restriction. This vulnerability affected GitHub Enterprise Server releases in the 3.17, 3.18, 3.19, 3.20, and 3.21 series and was fixed in versions 3.17.21, 3.18.15, 3.19.12, 3.20.8, and 3.21.6. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57149 | 1 Plone | 1 Plone.app.portlets | 2026-09-22 | 9.9 Critical |
| plone.app.portlets.portlets provides a Plone-specific user interface for plone.portlets, as well as a standard set of portlets that ship with Plone. Starting in version 5.0.0 and prior to versions 5.0.8, 6.0.4, and 7.0.2, the Classic portlet (plone.app.portlets.portlets.classic) used its user-supplied template/macro fields to build a TALES path expression that was then evaluated by the TAL path() helper. Because the value was interpreted as a full TALES expression, a user able to add or edit a Classic portlet could supply a crafted value that escapes simple path traversal and is evaluated as arbitrary code. This is exploitable by any authenticated user who can configure a Classic portlet - which, with the default role map, includes regular users on their personal dashboard. The result is code execution in the context of the Plone process, i.e. a privilege escalation across the trust boundary between an authenticated web user and the server-side process. The problem has been patched in `plone.app.portlets` 5.0.8, 6.0.4, and 7.0.2. Some workarounds are available. Restrict who can manage portlets: remove the `plone.app.portlets.ManageOwnPortlets` permission from untrusted roles, and limit Manage portlets to trusted administrators (usually this is already restricted to the Manager and Site Administrator roles). Where the Classic portlet is not needed, unregister it so it cannot be added. This would need to be done by editing a `portlets.xml` in your own code. One may also effectively disable showing the classic portlet by customising its template. In the Zope Management Interface go to the `portal_view_customizations` tool, locate the `classic.pt` template and click it. Click the Customize button. Remove all text and replace it with `<div>The classic portlet was disabled.</div>`. (This is not a recommended way of customizing a template, but in this case it is quite effective.) | ||||
| CVE-2026-78847 | 2026-09-22 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| An issue in gray-matter All versions (verified on 4.0.3) allows the JavaScript engine in lib/engines.js using eval() to parse front matter when language is js/javascript.This allows arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93752 | 1 Nv | 1 Cssom | 2026-09-22 | 7.5 High |
| CSSOM through 0.5.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability in CSSStyleDeclaration.setProperty() that fails to validate reserved property names. Attackers can supply a stylesheet with a declaration named length to replace the internal counter and trigger excessive memory allocation during cssText serialization, causing process termination. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92595 | 1 Nodemailer | 1 Nodemailer | 2026-09-22 | 5.9 Medium |
| Nodemailer (npm package `nodemailer`) versions 9.1.0 and earlier do not honor the `disableFileAccess` and `disableUrlAccess` sandbox options when message content is resolved through the public plugin API `MailMessage.resolveContent()` using the documented legacy three-argument signature `resolveContent(data, key, callback)`. Because `shared.resolveContent()` normalizes the missing `options` argument to an empty object, the message-level flags copied into `mail.data` by the MailMessage constructor are discarded, and `resolveContentValue()` skips both access-control checks, reaching `nmfetch(url)` or `fs.createReadStream(path)`. As a result, plugin or application code that resolves untrusted message content (html, text, attachment `path` or `href`) via this API can be induced to read arbitrary local files or issue outbound HTTP(S) requests (server-side request forgery), bypassing the sandbox the application enabled. The internal paths used by `transporter.sendMail()` (`resolveAll()`, `_convertDataImages()`, and the MIME streaming path) are not affected. Fixed in version 9.1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78625 | 1 Okta | 1 Access Gateway | 2026-09-22 | 6.7 Medium |
| The Okta Access Gateway does not sanitize dashboard label values before writing them into generated PHP configuration files. The generated file is automatically included during authentication requests, resulting in execution with the privileges of the web server process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88404 | 2026-09-22 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| A remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in the UniscriptExecutionService.execute() function (/services/script-execution.service.ts) of Univer v1.0.0-alpha.2 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted payload. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88403 | 1 Nocobase | 1 Nocobase | 2026-09-22 | 6.5 Medium |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the serverRequest function of nocobase v2.1.21 allows authenticated attackers to scan internal resources via a crafted HTTP request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94571 | 1 Openstack | 1 Octavia | 2026-09-22 | 7.4 High |
| In OpenStack Octavia before 18.0.1, the Amphora provider driver did not reject control characters in the L7 policy redirect_url and redirect_prefix fields. The RFC 3986 URL validator percent-encodes control characters before validating, and thus newlines passed structural checks, but Octavia stored and wrote the raw unencoded value directly into the HAProxy configuration generated on the amphora. An authenticated project member who owns a load balancer can therefore inject arbitrary HAProxy directives through a REDIRECT_TO_URL L7 policy. Only deployments using the Amphora provider are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76974 | 1 Sap | 1 Fiori Launchpad | 2026-09-22 | 5.3 Medium |
| SAP Fiori Launchpad does not sufficiently validate certain user-controlled input. An unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious link that, when clicked by an authenticated user, causes the browser to load attacker-controlled content from an external location. This could be used to exfiltrate sensitive information from the victim's session, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality. There is no impact on integrity and availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95623 | 1 Tauri | 1 Tauri-plugin-http | 2026-09-22 | 5.6 Medium |
| The Tauri HTTP plugin validates requested URLs against the application's configured scope allowlist only once, on the initial request. When the remote server responds with an HTTP 3xx redirect, reqwest follows the redirect internally without re-checking the new target URL against the scope. This allows an attacker who controls an allowed URL (or finds an open redirect on an allowed host) to reach disallowed destinations such as cloud metadata endpoints, localhost services, or internal network hosts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95501 | 1 Mtrano | 1 Apencms | 2026-09-22 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in mtrano APENCMS up to 6546096d354153309693efabb9a0d824628ed4f5. The affected element is the function eval of the file cms/weasel.php of the component Template Engine. The manipulation of the argument $_CMS['site'] results in code injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94016 | 1 Sourcecodester | 1 Drug Recommendation System | 2026-09-22 | 2.4 Low |
| A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Drug Recommendation System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /drug_recommender/Admin/add_symptom. Performing a manipulation of the argument txtname results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. | ||||