Export limit exceeded: 16295 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (16295 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-55114 | 1 Bmc | 1 Control-m/agent | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The improper order of AUTHORIZED_CTM_IP validation in the Control-M/Agent, where the Control-M/Server IP address is validated only after the SSL/TLS handshake is completed, exposes the Control-M/Agent to vulnerabilities in the SSL/TLS implementation under certain non-default conditions (e.g. CVE-2025-55117 or CVE-2025-55118) or potentially to resource exhaustion. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41224 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG907R (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG908C (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG909R (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG910C (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSL910 (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSL910NC (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916C (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916P (All versions < V5.10.0). The affected products do not properly enforce interface access restrictions when changing from management to non-management interface configurations until a system reboot occurs, despite configuration being saved. This could allow an attacker with network access and credentials to gain access to device through non-management and maintain SSH access to the device until reboot. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41232 | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Spring Security Aspects may not correctly locate method security annotations on private methods. This can cause an authorization bypass. Your application may be affected by this if the following are true: * You are using @EnableMethodSecurity(mode=ASPECTJ) and spring-security-aspects, and * You have Spring Security method annotations on a private method In that case, the target method may be able to be invoked without proper authorization. You are not affected if: * You are not using @EnableMethodSecurity(mode=ASPECTJ) or spring-security-aspects, or * You have no Spring Security-annotated private methods | ||||
| CVE-2024-47784 | 2026-04-15 | 2.6 Low | ||
| Unverified Password Change for ANC software that allows an authenticated attacker to bypass the old Password check in the password change form via a web HMI This issue affects ANC software version 1.1.4 and earlier. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41645 | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High | ||
| An unauthenticated remote attacker could use a demo account of the portal to hijack devices that were created in that account by mistake. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43699 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Client-Side Enforcement of Server-Side Security vulnerability in Salesforce OmniStudio (FlexCards) allows bypass of required permission check. This impacts OmniStudio: before Spring 2025 | ||||
| CVE-2025-61779 | 1 Confidential-containers | 1 Trustee | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| Confidential Containers's Trustee project contains tools and components for attesting confidential guests and providing secrets to them. In versions prior to 0.15.0, the attestation-policy endpoint didn't check if the kbs-client submitting the request was actually authenticated (had the right key). This allowed any kbs-client to actually change the attestation policy. Version 0.15.0 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-44044 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Keyoti SearchUnit prior to 9.0.0. is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE). An attacker who can force a vulnerable SearchUnit host into parsing maliciously crafted XML and/or DTD files can exfiltrate some files from the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54427 | 1 Polkadot | 1 Frontier | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Polkadot Frontier is an Ethereum and EVM compatibility layer for Polkadot and Substrate. The extrinsic note_min_gas_price_target is an inherent extrinsic, meaning only the block producer can call it. To ensure correctness, the ProvideInherent trait should be implemented for each inherent, which includes the check_inherent call. This allows other nodes to verify if the input (in this case, the target value) is correct. However, prior to commit a754b3d, the check_inherent function has not been implemented for note_min_gas_price_target. This lets the block producer set the target value without verification. The target is then used to set the MinGasPrice, which has an upper and lower bound defined in the on_initialize hook. The block producer can set the target to the upper bound. Which also increases the upper and lower bounds for the next block. Over time, this could result in continuously raising the gas price, making contract execution too expensive and ineffective for users. An attacker could use this flaw to manipulate the gas price, potentially leading to significantly inflated transaction fees. Such manipulation could render contract execution prohibitively expensive for users, effectively resulting in a denial-of-service condition for the network. This is fixed in version a754b3d. | ||||
| CVE-2025-21081 | 2026-04-15 | 4.5 Medium | ||
| Protection mechanism failure for some Edge Orchestrator software for Intel(R) Tiber™ Edge Platform may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54956 | 1 R-lib | 1 Gh | 2026-04-15 | 3.2 Low |
| The gh package before 1.5.0 for R delivers an HTTP response in a data structure that includes the Authorization header from the corresponding HTTP request. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41251 | 1 Vmware | 3 Cloud Foundation, Nsx, Nsx-t | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| VMware NSX contains a weak password recovery mechanism vulnerability. An unauthenticated malicious actor may exploit this to enumerate valid usernames, potentially enabling brute-force attacks. Impact: Username enumeration → credential brute force risk. Attack Vector: Remote, unauthenticated. Severity: Important. CVSSv3: 8.1 (High). Acknowledgments: Reported by the National Security Agency. Affected Products:VMware NSX 9.x.x.x, 4.2.x, 4.1.x, 4.0.x NSX-T 3.x VMware Cloud Foundation (with NSX) 5.x, 4.5.x Fixed Versions: NSX 9.0.1.0; 4.2.2.2/4.2.3.1 http://4.2.2.2/4.2.3.1 ; 4.1.2.7; NSX-T 3.2.4.3; CCF async patch (KB88287). Workarounds: None. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20047 | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium | ||
| Improper locking in the Intel(R) Integrated Connectivity I/O interface (CNVi) for some Intel(R) Core™ Ultra Processors may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46741 | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium | ||
| A suspended or recently logged-out user could continue to interact with Blueframe until the time-out period occurred. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34142 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| An XML External Entity (XXE) injection vulnerability exists in ETQ Reliance on the CG (legacy) platform within the `/resources/sessions/sso` endpoint. The SAML authentication handler processes XML input without disabling external entity resolution, allowing crafted SAML responses to invoke external entity references. This could enable attackers to retrieve sensitive files or perform server-side request forgery (SSRF). The issue was addressed by disabling external entity processing for the affected XML parser in versions SE.2025.1 and 2025.1.2. | ||||
| CVE-2021-47688 | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium | ||
| In WhiteBeam 0.2.0 through 0.2.1 before 0.2.2, a user with local access to a server can bypass the allow-list functionality because a file can be truncated in the OpenFileDescriptor action before the VerifyCanWrite action is performed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8066 | 2 Bunkerity, Linux | 2 Bunker Web, Linux | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability in Bunkerity Bunker Web on Linux allows Phishing.This issue affects Bunker Web: 1.6.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54952 | 1 Meta | 1 Executorch | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| An integer overflow vulnerability in the loading of ExecuTorch models can cause smaller-than-expected memory regions to be allocated, potentially resulting in code execution or other undesirable effects. This issue affects ExecuTorch prior to commit 8f062d3f661e20bb19b24b767b9a9a46e8359f2b. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54568 | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low | ||
| Akamai Rate Control alpha before 2025 allows attackers to send requests above the stipulated thresholds because the rate is measured separately for each edge node. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7881 | 2026-04-15 | 2.7 Low | ||
| A vulnerability was found in Mercusys MW301R 1.0.2 Build 190726 Rel.59423n. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Web Interface. The manipulation of the argument code leads to weak password recovery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||