Export limit exceeded: 403800 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (403800 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-78015 | 2026-10-09 | 3.7 Low | ||
| Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Use of Less Trusted Source vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information tampering. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62049 | 2026-10-09 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Crocoblock JetBlocks For Elementor jet-blocks allows Stored XSS.This issue affects JetBlocks For Elementor: from n/a through 1.5.2.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107935 | 1 Redhat | 8 Certifications, Edge Manager, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2026-10-09 | 9.3 Critical |
| A path traversal vulnerability was found in gvproxy, the network forwarder provided by the gvisor-tap-vsock package. The unauthenticated /services/forwarder/expose endpoint does not validate the caller-supplied socket path, allowing an attacker to delete arbitrary files on the host system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107914 | 1 Backdropcms | 1 Backdrop | 2026-10-09 | 7.8 High |
| Backdrop CMS 1.34 before 1.34.5 and 1.35 before 1.35.1 doesn't sufficiently protect configuration exports when delivering a compressed archive. This vulnerability is mitigated by the fact that an export must have been previously requested by someone with the "Synchronize, import, and export configuration" permission. NOTE: CVE-2026-107914 refers to the vulnerability in which config.admin.inc does not ensure that a file_unmanaged_delete operation occurs. Therefore, many archives could persist: config.tar.gz, config_0.tar.gz, config_1.tar.gz, etc. There is a separate config.module issue that could allow remote access by an anonymous user, but only for the one filename config.tar.gz. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1978 | 1 Hitachi | 59 E1090, E1090h, E390 and 56 more | 2026-10-09 | 8.3 High |
| Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in Hitachi Storage Navigator and the maintenance console in Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900, F350, F370, F700, F900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23, One Block 24, One Block 26, One Block 28. This issue affects Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900, F350, F370, F700, F900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23, One Block 24, One Block 26, One Block 28 : before DKCMAIN Ver. 88-08-16-xx/00, SVP Ver. 88-08-18-xx/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-07-26-xx/00, SVP Ver. 93-07-26-xx/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. A3-04-02-xx/00, MPC Ver. A3-04-02-xx/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. A3-03-41-xx/00, MPC Ver. A3-03-41-xx/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. A3-03-03-xx/00, MPC Ver. A3-03-03-xx/00. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78249 | 1 Fujifilm Business Innovation Corp. | 69 Apeos 3060 / 2560 / 1860 Japan Model, Apeos 3061 / 2561 / 2061 Japan Model, Apeos 3560 / 3060 / 2560 Asia Pacific Model and 66 more | 2026-10-09 | N/A |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in the web management interface of multiple Multifunction Devices and Printers, including Apeos C4571 1.1.3 and earlier, Apeos C3567 1.1.3, or other products listed, specifically in the handling of externally supplied parameters. If the device receives a specially crafted, malicious request, it may trigger unintended processing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86344 | 1 Redhat | 3 Directory Server, Enterprise Linux, Redhat Directory Server | 2026-10-09 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a complete LDAP operation followed by the first bytes of an incomplete LDAPMessage on the same connection, causing the server to hand that connection to a second worker thread before the first worker's result is flushed. The second worker blocks until nsslapd-ioblocktimeout while holding the connection mutex, preventing delivery of the completed operation's result. Repeating this across a small number of connections proportional to the configured worker-thread pool size exhausts the entire pool under default configuration, denying service to all clients (anonymous and authenticated, plaintext and TLS) for as long as the attacker maintains the connections. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86345 | 1 Redhat | 3 Directory Server, Enterprise Linux, Redhat Directory Server | 2026-10-09 | 9 Critical |
| A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. The server does not discard plaintext bytes already buffered from a client connection when negotiating StartTLS, allowing an on-path attacker to inject a crafted LDAP message that is processed after the TLS upgrade and whose response is delivered to the client in place of the client's own pending operation's response, due to messageID collision. This can cause a client application to treat a failed authentication (bind) attempt as successful. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78860 | 1 Mercusys | 1 Ac12 V2 | 2026-10-09 | 7.8 High |
| An issue in Mercusys AC12 V2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the storage of information in plaintext | ||||
| CVE-2026-78862 | 1 Mercusys | 1 Ac12 V2 | 2026-10-09 | 6.8 Medium |
| An issue in Mercusys AC12 V2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the UART serial interface on the printed circuit board (PCB) | ||||
| CVE-2026-105301 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On and 1 more | 2026-10-09 | 4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the X.509 client-certificate authenticator of Keycloak, a solution for identity and access management. The issue occurs when the server is configured to check certificate revocation using CRL Distribution Points or OCSP. An attacker can provide a specially crafted certificate that points to a malicious server, causing Keycloak to make unauthorized outbound requests to internal or external endpoints before the certificate is fully validated. This can lead to a blind server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105326 | 2 Cups, Redhat | 4 Cups, Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images and 1 more | 2026-10-09 | 2.5 Low |
| An argument injection flaw was found in CUPS. When email notification is configured, the CUPS scheduler accepts printer subscription requests that supply a mailto notify-recipient-uri. The mailto notifier passes the recipient address to the configured sendmail program without ensuring it cannot be interpreted as command-line options. A remote attacker who can reach the CUPS service could supply a crafted recipient value starting with "-" to influence sendmail behavior. Successful exploitation depends on the installed mail transfer agent and CUPS network exposure, and may lead to execution of attacker-controlled commands with the privileges of the CUPS service user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41563 | 2 Dawer Drew, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Sitemovr, Sitemovr | 2026-10-09 | 7.5 High |
| Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in Sitemovr <= 1.0.1 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97300 | 2 Arraytics, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Wp Event Solution, Wp Event Solution | 2026-10-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in WP Event Solution <= 4.1.25 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75962 | 2 Saadiqbal, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Post Smtp, Post Smtp | 2026-10-09 | 7.2 High |
| The Post SMTP – Complete Email Deliverability and SMTP Solution with Email Logs, Alerts, Backup SMTP & Mobile App plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'user_email' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This is exploitable without authentication on WordPress Multisite installations with public registration enabled, as WordPress accepts email addresses containing numeric HTML character references that Post SMTP's stricter validator rejects, persisting the attacker-controlled address verbatim to the email log via the failed-send exception message. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94270 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Deema Payment Gateway | 2026-10-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Deema Payment Gateway WordPress plugin through 1.1.2 does not verify the authenticity of incoming payment provider notifications, and ships with that verification disabled by default, allowing unauthenticated attackers to mark an unpaid order as paid, or to cancel or refund an existing order. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94271 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Deema Payment Gateway | 2026-10-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Deema Payment Gateway WordPress plugin through 1.1.2 does not verify the payment with the payment provider when handling the return from the hosted checkout, and does not check the payment status or amount, allowing unauthenticated users to have orders marked as paid without any payment being taken. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94299 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Elegro Crypto Payment | 2026-10-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| The elegro Crypto Payment WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not require a shared secret to be configured before trusting incoming payment notification requests, allowing unauthenticated attackers to forge payment confirmations and change the status of arbitrary orders on any installation where that secret has been left at its default empty value. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89289 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Fast Courier | 2026-10-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Fast Courier WordPress plugin through 5.2.3 does not restrict an unauthenticated REST route that writes order fulfillment data, allowing unauthenticated attackers to overwrite the courier status and customer-facing tracking details of any WooCommerce order by supplying its id. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94278 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 File Media Renamer | 2026-10-09 | 5.5 Medium |
| The File Media Renamer WordPress plugin through 1.3 does not verify that the requesting user is authorised to modify a given media attachment, allowing any user with file-upload privileges to rename attachments belonging to other users, including administrators, and to corrupt unrelated stored site data that referenced the old file path. | ||||