Export limit exceeded: 36345 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (36345 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-26864 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Windows 10, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 7 more | 2026-08-19 | 8.4 High |
| Windows Virtual Registry Provider Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-26861 | 1 Microsoft | 19 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 16 more | 2026-08-19 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-26860 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Windows 10, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 1909 and 6 more | 2026-08-19 | 7.8 High |
| Windows App-V Overlay Filter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-26859 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Power Bi Report Server | 2026-08-19 | 7.7 High |
| Microsoft Power BI Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-26854 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Exchange Server | 2026-08-19 | 6.6 Medium |
| Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-26412 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Exchange Server | 2026-08-19 | 9.1 Critical |
| Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-24110 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Hevc Video Extensions, High Efficiency Video Coding | 2026-08-19 | 7.8 High |
| HEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-24107 | 1 Microsoft | 19 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 16 more | 2026-08-19 | 5.5 Medium |
| Windows Event Tracing Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-24104 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Sharepoint Enterprise Server, Sharepoint Foundation, Sharepoint Foundation 2013 and 3 more | 2026-08-19 | 4.6 Medium |
| Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-24089 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Hevc Video Extensions, High Efficiency Video Coding | 2026-08-19 | 7.8 High |
| HEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-27083 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Remote Development | 2026-08-19 | 7.8 High |
| Remote Development Extension for Visual Studio Code Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-27082 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Quantum Development Kit | 2026-08-19 | 7.8 High |
| Quantum Development Kit for Visual Studio Code Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-27081 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Eslint, Visual Studio Code Eslint Extension | 2026-08-19 | 7.8 High |
| Visual Studio Code ESLint Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-27080 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Sphere | 2026-08-19 | 9.3 Critical |
| Azure Sphere Unsigned Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-27075 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Azure Container Instance, Azure Container Instances, Azure Container Registry and 3 more | 2026-08-19 | 6.8 Medium |
| Azure Virtual Machine Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-27074 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Sphere | 2026-08-19 | 6.2 Medium |
| Azure Sphere Unsigned Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-27060 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Visual Studio Code | 2026-08-19 | 7.8 High |
| Visual Studio Code Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-24108 | 1 Microsoft | 6 365 Apps, Excel, Office and 3 more | 2026-08-19 | 7.8 High |
| Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2026-53361 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-19 | 7.1 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Set gc_in_progress to true in unix_gc(). Igor Ushakov reported that unix_gc() could run with gc_in_progress being false if the work is scheduled while running: Thread 1 Thread 2 Thread 3 -------- -------- -------- unix_schedule_gc() unix_schedule_gc() `- if (!gc_in_progress) `- if (!gc_in_progress) |- gc_in_progress = true | `- queue_work() | unix_gc() <----------------/ | | |- gc_in_progress = true ... `- queue_work() | | `- gc_in_progress = false | | unix_gc() <---------------------------------------------' | ... /* gc_in_progress == false */ | `- gc_in_progress = false unix_peek_fpl() relies on gc_in_progress not to confuse GC by MSG_PEEK. Let's set gc_in_progress to true in unix_gc(). | ||||
| CVE-2026-53090 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-19 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix ld_{abs,ind} failure path analysis in subprogs Usage of ld_{abs,ind} instructions got extended into subprogs some time ago via commit 09b28d76eac4 ("bpf: Add abnormal return checks."). These are only allowed in subprograms when the latter are BTF annotated and have scalar return types. The code generator in bpf_gen_ld_abs() has an abnormal exit path (r0=0 + exit) from legacy cBPF times. While the enforcement is on scalar return types, the verifier must also simulate the path of abnormal exit if the packet data load via ld_{abs,ind} failed. This is currently not the case. Fix it by having the verifier simulate both success and failure paths, and extend it in similar ways as we do for tail calls. The success path (r0=unknown, continue to next insn) is pushed onto stack for later validation and the r0=0 and return to the caller is done on the fall-through side. | ||||