Export limit exceeded: 403491 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 403491 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 403491 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 403491 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 403491 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (403491 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-80381 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized SQL statements due to SQL injection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82895 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82900 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to delete arbitrary files due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105269 | 2026-10-08 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| Satel Netco Design versions prior to v2.1.7 contains a stored cross site scripting vulnerability. An authenticated user with Network Operator privileges could store untrusted content that is rendered without adequate neutralization. Successful exploitation could allow script execution in another user's browser when the affected content is viewed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81932 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.6 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify, or delete information in the back-end database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84032 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 5.6 Medium |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack due to improper certificate validation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84035 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84057 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84058 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 is vulnerable to a buffer overrun in the TDS (Microsoft SQL Server) PRELOGIN packet decoder. A remote attacker who can send a specially crafted TDS PRELOGIN packet to a network monitored by an IBM Guardium Collector may cause a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code on the Collector appliance. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84198 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84209 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84230 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to a race condition resulting from concurrent unsynchronized writes to a shared map. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84246 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84247 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to a path traversal vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84249 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2, and 12.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary management operations due to missing authentication for critical function. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84875 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84891 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to use of hard-coded credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87980 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 3.1 Low |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext storage of sensitive information in logs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104628 | 2026-10-08 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Satel Netco Design versions prior to v2.1.7 contains an inefficient regular expression complexity vulnerability. An authenticated user with Viewer privileges could submit crafted search input that causes excessive processing, potentially degrading the availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105275 | 2026-10-08 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Satel Netco Design versions prior to v2.1.7 contains a relative path traversal vulnerability in its data import functionality. An authenticated user with Viewer privileges could access file paths outside the intended directory and use observable application responses to determine whether files exist on the host system. | ||||