Export limit exceeded: 29893 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (29893 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-0018 | 3 Apple, Microsoft, Paloaltonetworks | 3 Macos, Windows, Globalprotect | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| An information exposure vulnerability exists in the Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect app on Windows and MacOS where the credentials of the local user account are sent to the GlobalProtect portal when the Single Sign-On feature is enabled in the GlobalProtect portal configuration. This product behavior is intentional and poses no security risk when connecting to trusted GlobalProtect portals configured to use the same Single Sign-On credentials both for the local user account as well as the GlobalProtect login. However when the credentials are different, the local account credentials are inadvertently sent to the GlobalProtect portal for authentication. A third party MITM type of attacker cannot see these credentials in transit. This vulnerability is a concern where the GlobalProtect app is deployed on Bring-your-Own-Device (BYOD) type of clients with private local user accounts or GlobalProtect app is used to connect to different organizations. Fixed versions of GlobalProtect app have an app setting to prevent the transmission of the user's local user credentials to the target GlobalProtect portal regardless of the portal configuration. This issue impacts: GlobalProtect app 5.1 versions earlier than GlobalProtect app 5.1.10 on Windows and MacOS; GlobalProtect app 5.2 versions earlier than GlobalProtect app 5.2.9 on Windows and MacOS This issue does not affect GlobalProtect app on other platforms. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0013 | 2 Microsoft, Paloaltonetworks | 2 Windows, Cortex Xdr Agent | 2024-11-21 | 5 Medium |
| A file information exposure vulnerability exists in the Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR agent that enables a local attacker to read the contents of arbitrary files on the system with elevated privileges when generating a support file. This issue impacts: Cortex XDR agent 5.0 versions earlier than Cortex XDR agent 5.0.12; Cortex XDR agent 6.1 versions earlier than Cortex XDR agent 6.1.9; Cortex XDR agent 7.2 versions earlier than Cortex XDR agent 7.2.4; Cortex XDR agent 7.3 versions earlier than Cortex XDR agent 7.3.2. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4428 | 1 What3words | 1 Autosuggest | 2024-11-21 | 2.7 Low |
| A vulnerability has been found in what3words Autosuggest Plugin up to 4.0.0 on WordPress and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function enqueue_scripts of the file w3w-autosuggest/public/class-w3w-autosuggest-public.php of the component Setting Handler. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. The attack can be launched remotely. Upgrading to version 4.0.1 is able to address this issue. The patch is named dd59cbac5f86057d6a73b87007c08b8bfa0c32ac. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-234247. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4294 | 1 Redhat | 3 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform, Openshift Osin | 2024-11-21 | 2.6 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in OpenShift OSIN. It has been classified as problematic. This affects the function ClientSecretMatches/CheckClientSecret. The manipulation of the argument secret leads to observable timing discrepancy. The name of the patch is 8612686d6dda34ae9ef6b5a974e4b7accb4fea29. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-216987. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4219 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in ImageMagick. The vulnerability occurs due to improper use of open functions and leads to a denial of service. This flaw allows an attacker to crash the system. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4212 | 1 Lenovo | 124 C340-14iml, C340-14iml Firmware, C340-15iml and 121 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.7 Medium |
| A potential vulnerability in the SMI callback function used in the Legacy BIOS mode driver in some Lenovo Notebook models may allow an attacker with local access and elevated privileges to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4211 | 1 Lenovo | 106 A340-22icb, A340-22icb Firmware, A340-22ick and 103 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.7 Medium |
| A potential vulnerability in the SMI callback function used in the SMBIOS event log driver in some Lenovo Desktop, ThinkStation, and ThinkEdge models may allow an attacker with local access and elevated privileges to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4210 | 1 Lenovo | 64 A540-24icb, A540-24icb Firmware, A540-27icb and 61 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.7 Medium |
| A potential vulnerability in the SMI callback function used in the NVME driver in some Lenovo Desktop, ThinkStation, and ThinkEdge models may allow an attacker with local access and elevated privileges to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4183 | 3 Fedoraproject, Oracle, Wireshark | 4 Fedora, Http Server, Zfs Storage Appliance Kit and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| Crash in the pcapng file parser in Wireshark 3.6.0 allows denial of service via crafted capture file | ||||
| CVE-2021-4180 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 2 Tripleo Heat Templates, Openstack | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| An information exposure flaw in openstack-tripleo-heat-templates allows an external user to discover the internal IP or hostname. An attacker could exploit this by checking the www_authenticate_uri parameter (which is visible to all end users) in configuration files. This would give sensitive information which may aid in additional system exploitation. This flaw affects openstack-tripleo-heat-templates versions prior to 11.6.1. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4177 | 1 Livehelperchat | 1 Live Helper Chat | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| livehelperchat is vulnerable to Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information | ||||
| CVE-2021-4138 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Geckodriver | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Improved Host header checks to reject requests not sent to a well-known local hostname or IP, or the server-specified hostname. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4125 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| It was found that the original fix for log4j CVE-2021-44228 and CVE-2021-45046 in the OpenShift metering hive containers was incomplete, as not all JndiLookup.class files were removed. This CVE only applies to the OpenShift Metering hive container images, shipped in OpenShift 4.8, 4.7 and 4.6. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4120 | 2 Canonical, Fedoraproject | 3 Snapd, Ubuntu Linux, Fedora | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
| snapd 2.54.2 fails to perform sufficient validation of snap content interface and layout paths, resulting in the ability for snaps to inject arbitrary AppArmor policy rules via malformed content interface and layout declarations and hence escape strict snap confinement. Fixed in snapd versions 2.54.3+18.04, 2.54.3+20.04 and 2.54.3+21.10.1 | ||||
| CVE-2021-4117 | 1 Yetiforce | 1 Yetiforce Customer Relationship Management | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| yetiforcecrm is vulnerable to Business Logic Errors | ||||
| CVE-2021-4111 | 1 Yetiforce | 1 Yetiforce Customer Relationship Management | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| yetiforcecrm is vulnerable to Business Logic Errors | ||||
| CVE-2021-4076 | 1 Tang Project | 1 Tang | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw exists in tang, a network-based cryptographic binding server, which could result in leak of private keys. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4059 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Google | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Chrome | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Insufficient data validation in loader in Google Chrome prior to 96.0.4664.93 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4047 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| The release of OpenShift 4.9.6 included four CVE fixes for the haproxy package, however the patch for CVE-2021-39242 was missing. This issue only affects Red Hat OpenShift 4.9. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4041 | 1 Redhat | 2 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Runner | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| A flaw was found in ansible-runner. An improper escaping of the shell command, while calling the ansible_runner.interface.run_command, can lead to parameters getting executed as host's shell command. A developer could unintentionally write code that gets executed in the host rather than the virtual environment. | ||||