| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The Divi theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.27.6. This is due to the `et_pb_set_video_oembed_thumbnail_resolution()` function using `wp_remote_get()` instead of `wp_safe_remote_get()` to fetch a remote image URL, which does not restrict requests to private or reserved IP ranges. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application server. The response body is not returned to the attacker (blind SSRF), but two oracles exist: a status oracle (the returned URL string differs depending on whether the target responded with HTTP 200) and a timing oracle (response time varies by target reachability). |
| The Divi Ajax Filter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Local File Inclusion in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.2 via the 'custom_loop_template' parameter parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to include and execute arbitrary .php files on the server, allowing the execution of any PHP code in those files. This can be used to bypass access controls, obtain sensitive data, or achieve code execution in cases where .php file types can be uploaded and included. This vulnerability is only exploitable when the loop_templates parameter is set to 'custom-template'. |
| The Post Grid and Gutenberg Blocks – ComboBlocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Unauthenticated Hook Injection in versions 2.2.32 to 2.3.1 via several functions in the ~/includes/blocks/form-wrap/function.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute actions with hooks in WordPress, granted no other security controls are present in the function. |
| In DocsGPT 0.15.0 and below, the application provides a custom prompt feature that allows users to define prompt content used during chatbot interactions. This functionality renders user-supplied prompt data using Jinja templates without input sanitization or sandboxing. An unauthenticated attacker can inject malicious template expressions, leading to a server-side template injection (SSTI) vulnerability that can be exploited to achieve full remote code execution (RCE). |
| Douyin_TikTok_Download_API through 4.1.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /api/download and /api/hybrid/video_data endpoints that allows unauthenticated attackers to fetch arbitrary URLs by supplying a url query parameter. Attackers can request internal services including cloud metadata endpoints and retrieve response bodies containing sensitive credentials through error messages. |
| The Greenshift WordPress plugin before 13.2.0 does not validate a user-supplied URL before fetching it server-side, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to make the server issue requests to arbitrary hosts and read the response. |
| A vulnerability was identified in itsourcecode Online Medicine Delivery System 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /index.php?q=orderdetails. Such manipulation of the argument location leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. |
| toml-node is a TOML parser for Node.js and the browser. Prior to 4.1.2, toml.parse() in lib/compiler.js can be tricked by a table path such as a.b.y.__proto__.__proto__, allowing traversal from a scalar value into Number.prototype and Object.prototype. The currentPath tracking value uses both arrays and strings, so valueAssignments records a comma-joined path such as a,b.y while deepRef checks the dot-joined path a.b.y, allowing the duplicate-key guard to miss and attacker-controlled keys to be written to Object.prototype. A table-array prefix-clearing path in addTableArray can also erase guard state before the same __proto__ traversal. Injected properties become visible throughout the Node.js process and can cause denial of service, logic or authorization bypass, or code execution when an application contains a suitable gadget. This issue is fixed in version 4.1.2. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SEOPress allows Server Side Request Forgery.
This issue affects SEOPress: from n/a through 10.1. |
| Label Studio through 1.23.0 fails to validate webhook URLs, allowing authenticated users to dispatch requests to internal services including RFC 1918 addresses and cloud metadata endpoints. Attackers can create webhooks targeting private networks and exfiltrate annotation data by enabling payload transmission in outbound requests. |
| WWBN AVideo through commit c91b5975d contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the set_api_userImages API endpoint that fails to validate profileImg and backgroundImg URLs before fetching them. Authenticated API clients can supply internal URLs to fetch cloud metadata or internal services, with responses written to publicly accessible web paths for retrieval. |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in SeaCMS up to 13.6. This impacts the function parseIf of the file seacms_locoy_news.php of the component Locoy Collector. The manipulation of the argument pwd leads to code injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. |
| A vulnerability has been found in NousResearch hermes-agent 0.18.0. This affects the function fetchLinkTitle of the file apps/desktop/src/app/artifacts/index.tsx of the component Link Title Fetch. Such manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A flaw was found in submariner. In cert-auth mode, the connection configuration is built using free-form strings from the Custom Resource Definition (CRD) without proper validation. A malicious cluster can exploit this by publishing a CableName that includes newlines and ipsec.conf directives. This allows an attacker to inject arbitrary configuration parameters or execute commands through leftupdown hooks, leading to remote code execution as root on the gateway node. |
| Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure SQL Database allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| Eval injection in cPanel 11.138.0.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code as root. |
| An issue was discovered in Lantronix EDS5000 2.1.0.0R3. An authenticated attacker can inject OS commands into the "tunnel" parameter when killing a tunnel connection. Injected commands are executed with root privileges. |
| An issue was discovered in Lantronix EDS5000 2.1.0.0R3. An authenticated attacker can inject OS commands into the "name" parameter when deleting SSL credentials through the management interface. Injected commands are executed with root privileges. |
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (CWE-94) in Fleet Server can lead to the execution of attacker-supplied script content via Code Injection (CAPEC-242). Kibana accepted an identifier for an output configuration without restricting it to safe characters. That identifier is later placed into a server-side script that Fleet Server builds as part of routine agent policy processing, so script syntax embedded in the identifier became part of the script that was executed rather than being treated as data. |
| An issue was discovered in Lantronix EDS5000 2.1.0.0R3. The Log Info page allows users to see log files by specifying their names. Due to a missing sanitization in the file name parameter, an authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary OS commands that are executed with root privileges. |
