| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote attacker to bypass authentication and escalate privileges due to improper validation of sub-requests. |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote attacker to gain unauthorized administrative access due to improper authentication. |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. |
| IBM Maximo Application Suite - Location Service for Esri Component 9.2, 9.1, and 9.0 is vulnerable to command injection due to improper sanitisation of a user-controlled value passed to a shell command in a Kubernetes operator task. |
| IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a local attacker to modify the BOOTP table due to improper authorization. |
| IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to perform brute-force attacks to obtain credentials due to improper authentication. |
| IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to enumerate user profiles due to the return of distinct error codes during the sign-on process. |
| IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a local attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper access control. |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to delete folders and applications belonging to other users due to improper functional level access control. |
| IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session |
| The Animated Number Counters plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'counterid' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.0 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. This is a second-order SQL injection: the write path correctly uses $wpdb->prepare(), but that protection is not carried forward to the read path, where the retrieved value is concatenated unsanitized into unprepared queries in both a single-quoted string context and a bare numeric context. |
| Froxlor 2.0.0 before 2.3.14 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows authenticated customers to inject HTML and JavaScript by setting a malicious theme value via customer_index.php. Script executes when an administrator views the customer overview with the Theme column enabled, letting attackers abuse the CSRF token to create administrator accounts or change server settings. |
| FreeRDP from 3.0.0 before 3.32.0 contains a heap out-of-bounds read vulnerability that allows a malicious RD Gateway to crash clients by sending mismatched message lengths. Attackers controlling the gateway can set MsgBytes far larger than the NDR string ActualCount in consent or service messages, causing UTF-8 conversion to read past the stream allocation and disrupt client availability. |
| Excelize is a Go language library for reading and writing Microsoft Excel spreadsheets. From 2.1.0 to 2.11.0, a Zip64 uncompressed size with the high bit set is converted from uint64 to a negative int64 before signed size-limit checks and allocation. ReadZipReader obtains UncompressedSize64 through FileInfo.Size and passes the wrapped negative value to readFile. When a crafted Zip64 entry declares an uncompressed size from 2^63 through 2^64-1 and the workbook is opened, the negative size bypasses unzip limits and reaches make as a negative capacity, allowing an attacker to panic during workbook opening. No fixed version is available as of this review. |
| Frappe ERPNext before 15.98.0 and 16.x before 16.6.0 contains an SQL injection vulnerability in some endpoints caused by missing input validation. Remote authenticated attackers can send specially crafted requests to the affected endpoints to manipulate database queries and extract sensitive information from the database. |
| Frappe ERPNext before 15.110.0 and 16.x before 16.21.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in which certain endpoints fail to enforce proper authorization checks on record status changes. Authenticated low-privileged users can call these endpoints to modify data beyond their permitted role, bypassing intended role-based access restrictions. |
| Frappe ERPNext before 15.112.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated users with a common operational role to modify records beyond their permissions due to missing validation in certain endpoints. Attackers holding this role can call the affected endpoints to change a field on record types outside their role's permissions, tampering with data they should not control. |
| Frappe ERPNext before 15.113.0 and 16.x before 16.24.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in which certain endpoints fail to enforce proper permission checks. Authenticated users can call these endpoints to read financial data beyond what their assigned role permits. |
| Frappe ERPNext before 15.119.0 and 16.x before 16.31.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in which certain endpoints fail to verify that the caller may read a document before sending transactional email about it. Authenticated attackers can call these endpoints to trigger transactional email for documents they are not permitted to read. |
| Frappe ERPNext before 15.102.0 and 16.x before 16.11.0 contains an SQL injection vulnerability in some endpoints due to missing input validation, allowing manipulation of database queries. Authenticated attackers can send specially crafted requests to the affected endpoints to extract sensitive information from the database. |
