| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Use of a hard-coded cryptographic key to encrypt security sensitive data in local storage and configuration in FortiClient for Windows prior to 6.4.0 may allow an attacker with access to the local storage or the configuration backup file to decrypt the sensitive data via knowledge of the hard-coded key. |
| Sakai through 12.6 allows XSS via a chat user name. |
| Liferay Portal through 7.2.0 GA1 allows XSS via a journal article title to journal_article/page.jsp in journal/journal-taglib. |
| Gophish through 0.8.0 allows XSS via a username. |
| The breadcrumbs contributed module through 0.2.0 for Padrino Framework allows XSS via a caption. |
| An issue was discovered in the compact_arena crate before 0.4.0 for Rust. Generativity is mishandled, leading to an out-of-bounds write or read. |
| YII2-CMS v1.0 has XSS in protected\core\modules\home\models\Contact.php via a name field to /contact.html. |
| Grav through 1.6.15 allows (Stored) Cross-Site Scripting due to JavaScript execution in SVG images. |
| Cross site scripting (XSS) in the photo-gallery (10Web Photo Gallery) plugin before 1.5.35 for WordPress exists via admin/controllers/Options.php. |
| Cross site scripting (XSS) in the photo-gallery (10Web Photo Gallery) plugin before 1.5.35 for WordPress exists via admin/models/Galleries.php. |
| Silver Peak EdgeConnect SD-WAN before 8.1.7.x has reflected XSS via the rest/json/configdb/download/ PATH_INFO. |
| The driver in Micro-Star MSI Afterburner 4.6.2.15658 (aka RTCore64.sys and RTCore32.sys) allows any authenticated user to read and write to arbitrary memory, I/O ports, and MSRs. This can be exploited for privilege escalation, code execution under high privileges, and information disclosure. These signed drivers can also be used to bypass the Microsoft driver-signing policy to deploy malicious code. |
| Kilo 0.0.1 has a heap-based buffer overflow because there is an integer overflow in a calculation involving the number of tabs in one row. |
| Symonics libmysofa 0.7 has an invalid write in readOHDRHeaderMessageDataLayout in hdf/dataobject.c. |
| An OS command injection vulnerability in the discover_and_manage CGI script in NETSAS Enigma NMS 65.0.0 and prior allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code because of improper neutralization of shell metacharacters in the ip_address variable within an snmp_browser action. |
| A number of stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities were identified in NETSAS Enigma NMS 65.0.0 and prior that could allow a threat actor to inject malicious code directly into the application through web application form inputs. |
| A number of stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities were identified in NETSAS Enigma NMS 65.0.0 and prior that could allow a threat actor to inject malicious code directly into the application through the SNMP protocol. |
| A CSRF vulnerability exists in NETSAS ENIGMA NMS version 65.0.0 and prior that could allow an attacker to be able to trick a victim into submitting a malicious manage_files.cgi request. This can be triggered via XSS or an IFRAME tag included within the site. |
| A vulnerability in the web framework of Cisco Emergency Responder could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web-based management interface. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of some parameters that are passed to the web server of the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to access a malicious link or by intercepting a user request for the affected web interface and injecting malicious code into that request. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected web-based management interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Crosswork Change Automation could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web-based management interface of an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface of an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. |
