| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Octopus Deploy 3.7.0-3.17.13 (fixed in 3.17.14) allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the Step Template Name parameter. |
| An issue was discovered in Octopus before 3.17.7. When the special Guest user account is granted the CertificateExportPrivateKey permission, and Guest Access is enabled for the Octopus Server, an attacker can sign in as the Guest account and export Certificates managed by Octopus, including the private key. |
| In Octopus Deploy 3.x before 3.15.4, an authenticated user with PackagePush permission to upload packages could upload a maliciously crafted NuGet package, potentially overwriting other packages or modifying system files. This is a directory traversal in the PackageId value. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for certain types of sensitive variables to inadvertently become unmasked when viewed in variable preview. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy users of certain browsers using AD to sign-in to Octopus Server were able to bypass authentication checks and be redirected to the configured redirect url without any validation. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server the help sidebar can be customized to include a Cross-Site Scripting payload in the support link. This was initially resolved in advisory 2022-07 however it was identified that the fix could be bypassed in certain circumstances. A different approach was taken to prevent the possibility of the support link being susceptible to XSS |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to upload a zipbomb file as a task which results in Denial of Service |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a user to view Workerpools without being explicitly assigned permissions to view these items |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a user to view Tagsets without being explicitly assigned permissions to view these items |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a user to introduce code via offline package creation |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to render user supplied input into the webpage |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to upload a zipbomb file as a task which results in Denial of Service |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to discover network details via error message |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible for the OpenID client secret to be logged in clear text during the configuration of Octopus Server. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy, there is no logging of changes to artifacts within Octopus Deploy. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it was identified that a session cookie could be used as the CSRF token |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it was identified that the same encryption process was used for both encrypting session cookies and variables. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to upload a package to built-in feed with insufficient permissions after re-indexing packages. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a low privileged guest user to craft a request that allows enumeration/recon of an environment. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a low privileged guest user to interact with extension endpoints. |