Export limit exceeded: 415715 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10974 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-62346 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Glovius Cloud | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in HCL Glovius Cloud. An attacker can force a user's web browser to execute an unwanted, malicious action on a trusted site where the user is authenticated, specifically on one endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55758 | 2 Jdownloads, Joomla | 3 Jdownloads, Joomla, Joomla! | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Multiple CSRF attack vectors in JDownloads component 1.0.0-4.0.47 for Joomla were discovered. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4375 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sparx Systems Pro Cloud Server allows Cross-Site Request Forgery to perform Session Hijacking. Cross-Site Request Forgery is present at the whole application but it can be used to change the Pro Cloud Server Configuration password. This issue affects Pro Cloud Server: earlier than 6.0.165. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48885 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| application-urlshortener create shortened URLs for XWiki pages. Versions prior to 1.2.4 are vulnerable to users with view access being able to create arbitrary pages. Any user (even guests) can create these docs, even if they don't exist already. This can enable guest users to denature the structure of wiki pages, by creating 1000's of pages with random name, that then become very difficult to handle by admins. Version 1.2.4 fixes the issue. No known workarounds are available. | ||||
| CVE-2025-58999 | 2 Loopus, Wordpress | 2 Wp Attractive Donations System, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in loopus WP Attractive Donations System - Easy Stripe & Paypal donations WP_AttractiveDonationsSystem allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Attractive Donations System - Easy Stripe & Paypal donations: from n/a through <= 1.25. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64253 | 1 Wordpress | 2 Health Check & Troubleshooting, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium |
| Path Traversal: '.../...//' vulnerability in WordPress.org Health Check & Troubleshooting health-check allows Path Traversal.This issue affects Health Check & Troubleshooting: from n/a through <= 1.7.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62797 | 1 Rathena | 1 Fluxcp | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| FluxCP is a web-based Control Panel for rAthena servers written in PHP. A critical Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the FluxCP-based website template used by multiple rAthena/Ragnarok servers. State-changing POST endpoints accept browser-initiated requests that are authorized solely by the session cookie without per-request anti-CSRF tokens or robust Origin/Referer validation. An attacker who can lure a logged-in user to an attacker-controlled page can cause that user to perform sensitive actions without their intent. This vulnerability is fixed with commit e3f130c. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24358 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| gorilla/csrf provides Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) prevention middleware for Go web applications & services. Prior to 1.7.2, gorilla/csrf does not validate the Origin header against an allowlist. Its executes its validation of the Referer header for cross-origin requests only when it believes the request is being served over TLS. It determines this by inspecting the r.URL.Scheme value. However, this value is never populated for "server" requests per the Go spec, and so this check does not run in practice. This vulnerability allows an attacker who has gained XSS on a subdomain or top level domain to perform authenticated form submissions against gorilla/csrf protected targets that share the same top level domain. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.7.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13710 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Estatebud – Properties & Listings plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'estatebud_settings' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12219 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Stop Registration Spam plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.23. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. CVE-2024-56017 is likely a duplicate of this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14317 | 1 Emaintenance | 1 Crazy Bubble Tea | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| In Crazy Bubble Tea mobile application authenticated attacker can obtain personal information about other users by enumerating a `loyaltyGuestId` parameter. Server does not verify the permissions required to obtain the data. This issue was fixed in version 915 (Android) and 7.4.1 (iOS). | ||||
| CVE-2025-14266 | 1 Ercom | 1 Cryptobox | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| CSRF in Ercom Cryptobox administration console allows attacker to trigger some actions on behalf of a Cryptobox administrator. The attack requires the administrator to browse a malicious web site or to click a link while he has an open session on the administration console. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50923 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| In QUIC in RFC 9000, the Latency Spin Bit specification (section 17.4) does not strictly constrain the bit value when the feature is disabled, which might allow remote attackers to construct a covert channel with data represented as changes to the bit value. NOTE: The "Sheridan, S., Keane, A. (2015). In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ECCWS), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK." paper says "Modern Internet communication protocols provide an almost infinite number of ways in which data can be hidden or embed whithin seemingly normal network traffic." | ||||
| CVE-2023-51416 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EnvialoSimple EnvíaloSimple.This issue affects EnvíaloSimple: from n/a through 2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12373 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Torod – The smart shipping and delivery portal for e-shops and retailers plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_settings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20060 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| An attacker could expose cross-user personal identifiable information (PII) and personal health information transmitted to the Android device via the Dario Health application database. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7850 | 2 Dontdream, Wordpress | 2 Bp Profile Search, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The BP Profile Search plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.7.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the bps_ajax_field_selector(), bps_ajax_template_options(), and bps_ajax_field_row() functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7608 | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| An authenticated user can access the restricted files from NX, EX, FX, AX, IVX and CMS using path traversal. | ||||
| CVE-2023-26248 | 1 Kademila | 1 Dht | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Kademlia DHT (go-libp2p-kad-dht 0.20.0 and earlier) used in IPFS (0.18.1 and earlier) assigns routing information for content (i.e., information about who holds the content) to be stored by peers whose peer IDs have a small DHT distance from the content ID. This allows an attacker to censor content by generating many Sybil peers whose peer IDs have a small distance from the content ID, thus hijacking the content resolution process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62362 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| gpp-burgerportaal is a Dutch government citizen portal application. In versions before 2.0.3, 3.0.2, and 4.0.1, the name and email address of employees who publish content are exposed in network responses and can be discovered by viewing the browser's developer tools network tab. This information disclosure may violate employee privacy expectations and could be used for targeted attacks or unwanted contact. This issue has been patched in versions 2.0.3, 3.0.2, and 4.0.1. No known workarounds exist. | ||||