Export limit exceeded: 403995 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 403995 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 403995 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 403995 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (403995 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-84245 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-10 | 7.8 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a local privilege escalation in the cp_wrapper component. A low-privileged local user could exploit this vulnerability to gain root privileges and access or modify sensitive system files. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84198 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-10 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84057 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-10 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84035 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-10 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80381 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized SQL statements due to SQL injection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62128 | 2 Creator Lms, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Creator Lms, Creator Lms | 2026-10-10 | 5.3 Medium |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Creator LMS Creator LMS creatorlms allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Creator LMS: from n/a through 1.2.21. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16178 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-10 | 7.5 High |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper input validation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16165 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-10 | 7.5 High |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to a null pointer dereference. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14905 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-10 | 8.2 High |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 is vulnerable to an XML external entity injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose sensitive information or consume memory resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14521 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-10 | 4.9 Medium |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13257 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow an authenticated user to forge signature requests due to improper verification of data authenticity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107639 | 1 Ilias | 1 Ilias | 2026-10-10 | 8.8 High |
| ILIAS before 9.24, 10.x before 10.12 and 11.x before 11.5 contains an argument injection vulnerability in assImagemapQuestionGUI that allows question authors to inject ImageMagick convert options via uploaded image filenames. Attackers can embed tab-separated options, which escapeshellcmd() does not neutralise, to write a PHP file under the web root and achieve remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107634 | 1 Aorimn | 1 Dislocker | 2026-10-10 | 6.1 Medium |
| Dislocker through 0.7.3 contains a heap out-of-bounds read vulnerability in get_dataset() and get_next_datum() that never validate dataset and datum sizes against the metadata allocation. Attackers can craft a BitLocker volume image with inflated dataset or datum sizes that, when opened or mounted, crashes dislocker or discloses adjacent heap memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105829 | 1 Thephpleague | 1 Commonmark | 2026-10-10 | 6.1 Medium |
| League CommonMark from 1.3.0 before 2.10.2 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows users posting Markdown to bypass the DisallowedRawHtml extension by ending raw HTML with a bare disallowed tag name. Attackers can place a lone <script or <iframe line followed by a block supplying attributes like src or onload, executing stored scripts in viewers' browsers under default GFM settings. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108501 | 2026-10-10 | 5.7 Medium | ||
| ZTE Z80 Ultra has a system interface permission verification defect. The interface lacks necessary access control, and relevant information can be read by reflectively invoking the interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94589 | 2026-10-10 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The Extensions For CF7 (Contact form 7 Database, Conditional Fields and Redirection) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.5 via the extcf7_submit function. This is due to missing file extension, MIME type, and size validation in the signature field's validation_filter(), combined with the absence of PHP-execution guards in the upload directory and a sanitize_file_name() bypass that converts shell.php- into shell.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload files that may be executable, which makes remote code execution possible. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103365 | 2026-10-10 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The Bookly – Online Scheduling and Appointment Booking System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in versions up to, and including, 28.4 via the classic booking form's Details step. The endpoint bookly_render_details is registered for both wp_ajax and wp_ajax_nopriv, the module overrides csrfTokenValid() to always return true, and Bookly\Frontend\Components\Booking\InfoText::getCodes() calls UserBookingData::getCustomer() to load the persisted Customer entity keyed solely by the attacker-supplied phone (or email) with no invocation of the plugin's own customerIdentityConfirmed() predicate. When a site owner has placed the supported {client_name}, {client_email}, {client_phone}, or {client_note} placeholders into the Details step's Appearance information text, the matched customer's stored name, email, phone and internal notes are substituted into the returned HTML. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers who know only a registered customer's primary phone (or email) to read that customer's stored personal data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104732 | 2026-10-10 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The Advanced IP Blocker plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 8.13.13 The vulnerability exists because `handle_login_action()` performs no server-side check — via transient, session marker, or equivalent — that a requester completed step-1 password authentication before processing a step-2 TOTP submission for the POSTed `user_id`; compounding this, an error branch in the function unconditionally mints a fresh `advaipbl-2fa-interim-{user_id}` nonce and delivers it in a `Location` header to any unauthenticated caller, after which `display_2fa_login_form_step_2()` renders a valid `advaipbl-2fa-verify-{user_id}` nonce in HTML — both nonces computed against a fixed `uid=0` empty-session context and therefore fully reusable by the attacker across subsequent requests. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication entirely for any 2FA-enabled account, including administrators, by brute-forcing an unthrottled 6-digit TOTP code (no attempt counter, no account lockout, and no `wp_login_failed` firing) and receiving a fully authenticated session cookie via `wp_set_auth_cookie` without ever supplying the account password, resulting in complete site takeover. Exploitation requires only a known `user_id` for an account that has the plugin's 2FA feature enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107645 | 2026-10-10 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| The Blocksy Companion plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation in versions up to, and including, 2.1.58 This is due to the implement_user_registration() AJAX handler explicitly disabling Dokan's vendor-registration nonce check (via add_filter('dokan_register_nonce_check', '__return_false')) and then trusting an attacker-supplied $_POST['role'] value when invoking wc_create_new_customer() and wc_set_customer_auth_cookie(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to elevate their privileges to a Dokan 'seller' (vendor) account — including sites where the Dokan vendor signup is explicitly turned off — and to be auto-authenticated into that account, which grants publishing capabilities beyond those of a normal customer. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104797 | 2026-10-10 | 8.1 High | ||
| The Advanced Form Integration — Connect Forms to 300+ Apps plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass via Unverified Password Change in all versions up to, and including, 2.9.0 The `adfoin_ultimatememberac_send_data` function, which powers the Ultimate Member "Update Profile Field" action, resolves the target WordPress user from an attacker-supplied email address and passes an attacker-controlled field key and value directly to `UM()->user()->update_profile()` in the `account` context — which explicitly bypasses Ultimate Member's banned-key validation — without performing any submitter identity verification, ownership check, capability check, current-password reauthentication, or restriction on sensitive keys such as `user_pass`. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the password of any WordPress user account, including Administrator accounts, by submitting a public Contact Form 7 form with a target email and `user_pass` as the field key, enabling full site takeover. Exploitation requires an administrator to have pre-configured a Contact Form 7 integration that maps the target email, field key, and value from public form inputs to the Ultimate Member Update Profile Field action — the exact workflow the plugin's own UI advertises for this action type. | ||||